What Is The Optimal Method For Incorporating Dynamic Rupture Simulations Into A Bayesian Inversion Framework To Constrain The Spatial Distribution Of Slip Rate Heterogeneities Along A Fault Plane, Particularly When Dealing With Incomplete And Noisy Datasets From A Combination Of Seismic, Geodetic, And Paleoseismic Observations?

by ADMIN 330 views

To address the challenge of incorporating dynamic rupture simulations into a Bayesian inversion framework for constraining slip rate heterogeneities on a fault plane, the following structured approach is proposed:

  1. Problem Definition and Parameterization:

    • Objective: Determine the spatial distribution of slip rates along a fault using data from seismic, geodetic, and paleoseismic observations.
    • Parameters: Define the slip rate distribution as a set of parameters, possibly on a grid or using basis functions.

  2. Forward Modeling with Emulators:

    • Dynamic Rupture Simulations: Use these simulations to generate synthetic data based on input parameters.
    • Emulator Development: Train an emulator (e.g., Gaussian processes, neural networks) on simulation outputs to approximate results efficiently, reducing computational cost.

  3. Bayesian Inversion Framework:

    • Prior Distribution: Implement a hierarchical Bayesian model with priors reflecting initial beliefs about slip rates, possibly incorporating smoothness constraints.
    • Likelihood Function: Combine probabilities from different data types, accounting for their specific uncertainties (e.g., Gaussian for seismic, Poisson for paleoseismic).

  4. Efficient Computational Methods:

    • Surrogate Models: Utilize emulators to replace expensive simulations within the Bayesian framework.
    • Sampling Techniques: Apply Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, possibly with variants like Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, to efficiently explore parameter space.

  5. Regularization and Dimensionality Reduction:

    • Regularization Techniques: Incorporate methods to stabilize inversion, such as Tikhonov regularization for smoothness or sparse promoting priors.
    • Dimensionality Reduction: Use techniques like PCA to manage high-dimensional parameter spaces.

  6. Validation and Testing:

    • Synthetic Data Tests: Validate the framework by recovering known slip distributions from synthetic data.
    • Cross-Validation: Ensure the method's robustness to different data scenarios and noise levels.

  7. Application to Real Data:

    • Posterior Inference: Use the validated framework to infer the posterior distribution of slip rates from actual datasets, quantifying uncertainties.

  8. Uncertainty Quantification and Interpretation:

    • Posterior Analysis: Extract the most likely slip distribution and associated uncertainties, providing insights for earthquake risk assessment.

By integrating dynamic rupture simulations with Bayesian methods, this approach efficiently handles incomplete and noisy data, providing a robust estimation of slip rate heterogeneities and their uncertainties.